| Interested-Participant |
|
Questions, Comments & History
Atom Site Feed
HARD ROLL Ace of Spades
Bad Example
Classical Values
Debbie Schlussel
Gateway Pundit
Head Noises
IMAO
Jammie Wearing Fools
KevinDonahue.com
LaShawn Barber
Marmot's Hole
OpinionBug
Random Nuclear Strikes
Samablog
The Corner
Weapons of Mass Discussion
![]()
![]() ![]() ARCHIVES March 2012 December 2011 December 2010 December 2009 December 2008 December 2007 December 2006 December 2005 December 2004 December 2003 Notable Posts "Always remember to tip the waitress."
|
Thursday, May 29, 2008
Following Entry Posted
5/29/2008 04:10:00 PM
(Fresno, California) If a woman visits a podiatrist for a foot problem, it should be expected that the doctor will want to see and feel the woman's breasts. This is according to a court ruling this week in Fresno. Foot doctor Matthew Sciaroni was acquitted by a jury of charges that he performed breast exams for no good reason when a woman complained about her feet. Sciaroni said it was a necessary exam. The jury agreed. Therefore, ladies, before going to have your feet checked, realize that you're entering a no shoes, no shirt service zone. [Update 05/30/08] Here's more information from the Fresno Bee: Asked what he's going to do next, Sciaroni turned to his defense attorney, Steven Smith and yelled: "We're going fishing in Cabo!"Obviously, not everyone was happy with the outcome of the trial. [Update II] Wow! Here's a breaking story out of Cook County, Illinois. A 63-year-old foot doctor, Anthony Overton, has been sentenced to six years in prison for sexually assaulting a woman during a foot examination. Convicted last month on two separate counts of aggravated criminal sexual assault, Overton has maintained that he was only giving the elderly patient a physical examination that included a vaginal and rectal exam, a contention both supported and rejected by expert testimony during the trial.Interesting. Podiatrists examining female parts other than the feet is allowed in California but not so in Illinois. What we have here is a lack of consensus. |
|