From the Telegraph:
It is perfectly legal to ogle a man's chest but not a woman's breasts, according to an unusual ruling on what constitutes voyeurism by a panel of leading judges at the Court of Appeal yesterday.Typical. People are free to treat men as prurient flesh and ogle their moobs with impunity. It's blatant discrimination. I feel so cheap.
Only women's breasts can be regarded as "private parts", whereas the male chest -- even if the male in question has man breasts, or "moobs" as they are known -- cannot, the judges say.
The distinction between the sexual status of the female and male chest area was made during the quashing of a conviction for voyeurism at a public swimming pool.
Kevin Bassett, of Spalding, Lincs, was found guilty last year of the charge after he secretly filmed a man as he showered in his trunks.
The 44-year-old care home worker was given an 18-month supervision order, but appealed on the grounds that the alleged offence did not fall into any category in the 2003 Sexual Offences Act under which he was charged.
No comments:
Post a Comment