Monday, November 24, 2014


Climate Science is Settled?

Stop funding it then

Governments are running huge deficits, but still spend billions on “climate research” especially trying to model the effect of the atmosphere and its trace of carbon dioxide on surface temperature. Benefits are hard to find. It may have improved weather forecasts by a day or so, but official long-term predictions have not improved in the last fifty years. This is because carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is not the main driver of weather or climate.

“What is referred to reverently as “climate research” is mainly just grubby advocacy supporting the political war on carbon. Why are we still funding scientists who believe that “the science is settled”? If they believe that they know the answers, what are they are doing with their research funds?”

Around the world there are five official weather data-bases, about 14 weather satellites (some say there are 88 of them!), 73 climate computer models, at least 30 research groups and thousands of academics receiving grants and attending never-ending climate conferences. Much of this torrent of public money is now focussed on trying to torture a climate confession out of one normally un-noticed and totally innocent trace gas in the atmosphere – carbon dioxide.

The major determinants of surface weather are latitude, earth’s rotation, the seasons, the sun with its variable radiations and orbital changes; and nearness to the oceans which maintain the water cycle, moderate temperatures and house massive volcanic chains.

Earth’s mighty oceans cover 70% of the surface. Evaporation of water and convection in the atmosphere transfer large quantities of solar heat from the surface to the stratosphere. This process creates clouds, rain and snow and also forms low pressure zones which are the birthplace for cyclones and hurricanes. Wind direction and strength are related to sun-generated convection in the atmosphere, the transfer of solar heat from the equator to the poles, and the Coriolis effect of the rotation of the earth. Carbon dioxide plays no significant part in these processes.

Oceans also conceal most of the volcanic ring-of-fire and are home to huge numbers of volcanoes, many of which are active. The mighty weather-changing ENSO/El Nino starts with a pool of warm water in the eastern Pacific. Carbon dioxide plays no part in creating such hot-spots, but periodic eruption of undersea volcanoes may do it. We know less about the floor of the oceans and their volcanoes than we do about the surface of Mars.

The community is getting little benefit from much atmospheric research and most climate modelling, and that money should be redirected to more productive areas.

Half of “climate research” money should be spent on improving the ability of public infrastructure to survive natural disasters.

The remaining funds should be spent on real climate research - mapping the floor of the oceans, with particular reference to locating active volcanoes; and investigating how volcanism, solar variations and cycles of the sun, moon, planets and solar system impact long-term weather forecasts and future climate. This work should preferably be done by contracting private operators; and the climate models in public hands should be handed over to practising meteorologists to see if they are useful for short-term weather forecasting.

SOURCE

Posted by John J. Ray (M.A.; Ph.D.).



3 comments:

Wireless.Phil said...

A few days ago, (just last week), I read that they are blaming all the CO2 on all the corn we now grow.
I stopped reading it.

Doom said...

Defunding? What would academics have to do? They don't seem to be doing anything else any more successfully. Then again, when hasn't that been true? If you remember, NASA was stripped of the task of getting an airplane to go faster than the speed of sound. The Air Force took over and just did it. Still, no worries, I am quite with the notion of defunding.

Wireless.Phil said...

Antarctic ice THICKER than thought.
2 articles:

Antarctic ice THICKER than first feared – penguin-bot boffinsRobo-sub scans freezing waters, rocks warming models
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/11/25/penguinpowered_robot_finds_antarctic_sea_ice_is_thicker_than_first_thought/

Robot discovers that Antarctic ice is thicker than we thought (+video)

Using a submersible robot, scientists have measured the thickness of Antarctic ice.
http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2014/1124/Robot-discovers-that-Antarctic-ice-is-thicker-than-we-thought-video


Home

eXTReMe Tracker