Monday, February 02, 2015

More Warmist crookedness

Joe Romm recently tried to show that the recent heavy snowfall in the N.E. of the U.S.coast area proved global warming. I pointed out the major logical fault in that claim a few days ago and left the matter at that.  Another strange thing about the claim however is to associate heavy snow with warming.  Snow is cold stuff.  Doesn't unusually heavy snow therefore indicate unusual cold, not unusual warmth?

But illogic is not the only fault in the article.  Steve Goddard has recently put up the graph below which shows the claim to be utterly dishonest from the start.  The Warmists involved are quite psychopathic in their lack of any ethics or morality.

Goddard went back to the original data and found that the whole claim is founded on a careful cherrypick from the data.  They have used one of the oldest tricks of chartmanship:  Choosing the range you display. And in this case extending the range displayed gives a totally opposite conclusion to the one drawn by the Warmists

If image does not come up click here

Posted by John J. Ray (M.A.; Ph.D.).


Wireless.Phil said...

More crust uplift, no climat change BS mentioned.

Figure 1. Land uplift in Northern Ostrobothnia between 5000 BCE - 2000. Topographic data: (c) National Land Survey of Finland, 2012; Map design and animation: (c) Juha Oksanen, 2012 .

The Fennoscandian land uplift has been known for centuries.

Wireless.Phil said...

Climate deniers outnumber the pro climate fools.


eXTReMe Tracker